Skip to content
Good for Bots

Next.js websites, ranked

Sites built with Next.js, ordered by how well language models and agents can read them. Each row splits the score into the readable base, the agent layer and penalties.

How the score is calculatedBrowse Next.js websites in the directory

Ranked
84
Median score
62
New this week
14
Latest scan
28 Oct 2026
  • Excellent 6
  • Good 14
  • Fair 49
  • Poor 15
Next.js websites, ranked. Column headers sort the list; the place is always the place in the whole ranking.
PlaceSiteScore
38th place

matchfactoryguide.com

Base 42 · Agent 23 · Penalties 0

View report for Match Factory Walkthrough:
40th place

iqinsight.io

Base 45 · Agent 19 · Penalties 0

View report for IQInsight:
44th place

traecta.com

Base 40 · Agent 20 · Penalties 0

View report for Traecta:
67th place

connectionshintsapp.com

Base 46 · Agent 0 · Penalties 0

View report for ConnectionsHint:
77th place

learnviet.co

Base 39 · Agent 0 · Penalties 0

View report for Learn Vietnamese:

Places follow the score; on an equal score, more agent capabilities (the +N on the badge) come first. Sites equal on both share a place. Filters and other orders hide rows but never renumber them.

New added in the last seven days

Promarks a Pro listing, in gold. Pro never changes a score or a place.What Pro includes

From the latest scans

How Next.js sites do on each check

Missed most often

  1. Missing or partial on 80 of the 84 sites it applies to. Guide: How to write robots.txt rules for AI crawlers →

  2. Missing or partial on 78 of the 84 sites it applies to. Guide: How to serve Markdown to AI agents with content negotiation →

  3. Missing or partial on 77 of the 84 sites it applies to. Guide: How to serve Markdown to AI agents with content negotiation →

Where the top 10 pull ahead

  1. Markdown at its own URL
    Top 10100%Below15%

    10 of 10 in the top 10 pass it, against 11 of 74 below.

  2. llms.txt quality
    Top 10100%Below36%

    10 of 10 in the top 10 pass it, against 27 of 74 below.

  3. Typed discovery links
    Top 1060%Below0%

    6 of 10 in the top 10 pass it, against 0 of 74 below.

The share of sites passing each check on their latest scan. A check that does not apply to a site leaves it out of that check's share.
CheckThis rankingAll sitesTop 10Below
Readable base Share of sites with a full pass.
robots.txt
100%
98%100%100%
Sitemaps
100%
96%100%100%
schema.org structured data
73%
72%100%69%
Semantic HTML
63%
56%80%61%
Crawlable navigation links
99%
92%100%99%
Names for links and buttons
90%
88%100%89%
Names and semantics for form fields
78%
72%83%78%
Roles, states and relationships for controls
58%
73%60%58%
Canonical URL
96%
93%88%97%
Section links
90%
88%86%90%
Agent layer Share of sites with a full pass.
llms.txt
58%
55%100%53%
llms.txt quality
44%
38%100%36%
Markdown at its own URL
25%
23%100%15%
Markdown negotiation
8%
8%60%1%
Explicit AI crawler rules
42%
34%90%35%
AI usage preferences
5%
7%20%3%
Typed discovery links
7%
6%60%0%
Penalties Share of sites where the problem was not found.
Bot challenges
100%
98%100%100%
Indexing and snippet restrictions
100%
100%100%100%
Content without JavaScript
100%
99%100%100%
Search crawler access
100%
99%100%100%
Homepage availability
100%
99%100%100%
Page title and description
99%
99%100%99%
Redirect chains
100%
100%100%100%
Crawler response time
100%
99%100%100%
Agent capabilities Share of sites that publish it. Never a point either way.
API Catalog
4%
4%20%1%
auth.md
0%
2%0%0%
MCP Server Card
0%
0%0%0%
A2A Agent Card
2%
2%0%3%
Agent Skills discovery
2%
3%0%3%
WebMCP declarations
0%
0%0%0%
Web Bot Auth
0%
1%0%0%
x402 and MPP payments
0%
1%0%0%
ACP discovery
0%
1%0%0%
UCP discovery
0%
0%0%0%
AMP discovery
0%
0%0%0%

Where would your site place?

Scan it for free. The report shows its score, its place in its category and the fixes that would move it up.

Free, no account. Our bot reads your robots.txt before anything else.