Skip to content
Good for Bots

Open-source project workspace for teams and AI agents

Good for Bots: Good, 80 of 100Get this badge →

On your homepage, it turns this report’s link to tale.dev dofollow.

Scanned

What is Tale?

Tale is an open-source project workspace designed for teams and AI agents. It allows users to plan projects, delegate tasks to agents, and review results within a shared environment that combines task boards, agent sandboxes, shared knowledge, and workflows. Built for collaborative teams such as software development, marketing, and operations, Tale supports multiple runtimes and model providers including Claude, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, and OpenAI. The platform can be self-hosted using Docker on user infrastructure or used via cloud options.

Through a bot’s eyes

“Tale is an open-source project workspace for teams and AI agents that combines task boards, agent sandboxes, shared knowledge, and workflows.”

Simulated from the response GoodForBotsBot received on , not a live answer from any AI assistant.

What it can read, and what stays hidden →

What a bot can read

A language model reading the provided inputs learns that Tale is an open-source project workspace published by Ruler GmbH in Spiez, Switzerland. The homepage and llms.txt provide comprehensive details about platform features, including shared task boards, agent sandboxes, automations, and knowledge management. The text covers supported agent runtimes, connected tool integrations like GitHub and Slack, use cases for marketing and engineering, and extensive frequently asked questions addressing self-hosting, air-gapped deployments, and model choices. Pricing details are fully articulated across the homepage, llms.txt, and JSON-LD blocks, stating that the Community edition is free and open source, while the Enterprise edition costs 12 CHF or 14 EUR per user per month. The embedded JSON-LD provides structured organization and software application data, while the llms.txt file supplies a complete directory of platform pages and comparison articles.

Good for Bots report

Tale scores 80 of 100: 49 of the 50 base points, 31 of the 50 agent-layer points, no penalties.

Earned

49 of the 50 base points above the line, 31 of the 50 agent-layer points below it.

80

Still open

Behind the checks below, with prompts in Pro.

2
Penalties0
How scoring works · current methodology →

For the owner of tale.dev

3 prompts, 18 points

They are in the owner view, ready to paste into Claude Code, Cursor or Codex, beside the badge and rescans.

Open the owner view →

Select a check to see what we found and how it is graded.

Readable base

48.8 / 50

Passes.

3.3 of 3.3 points.

robots.txt is valid, with 1 user-agent group.

Passes.

8.3 of 8.3 points.

Sitemap declared in robots.txt, listing at least 400 URLs.

Passes.

8.3 of 8.3 points.

3 of 4 pages read pass; 1 partly. The page at /contact declares BreadcrumbList but names none of them, so the markup asserts that something exists without saying what.

Passes.

10 of 10 points.

3 of 4 pages read pass; 1 partly. The page at /contact is partly structured: The outline jumps from h1 to h3, which the standard forbids.

Passes.

8.3 of 8.3 points.

24 of 24 assessed homepage navigation links expose usable destinations.

Passes.

4.2 of 4.2 points.

66 of 66 assessed homepage links and buttons have a nonempty accessible name.

Passes.

2.5 of 2.5 points.

3 of 3 assessed homepage form fields meet the static naming and field-semantics checks.

Half passes.

1.3 of 2.5 points.

74 of 77 assessed homepage controls and role declarations meet the static role, state and relationship checks.

Prompt in Pro →
Passes.

1.7 of 1.7 points.

All 4 pages read pass. The homepage declares itself as its canonical URL.

Agent layer

31.3 / 50

Passes.

11.3 of 11.3 points.

/llms.txt is well formed: 78 links across 3 sections.

Passes.

7.5 of 7.5 points.

/llms.txt is descriptive: a summary plus descriptions on 96% of links.

Passes.

12.5 of 12.5 points.

/llms-full.txt serves the site's content as markdown (at least 64 KB).

Fails.

0 of 10 points.

None of the 4 pages read pass. Asking the homepage for markdown still returns text/html.

Fails.

0 of 5 points.

robots.txt names no AI crawlers, so every operator has to guess.

Fails.

0 of 2.5 points.

No usage declaration found in robots.txt or the final successful homepage response header.

Penalties

− 0

Passes.

Penalty: 0 of 15 points.

Our crawler reaches the page without being challenged.

Passes.

Penalty: 0 of 20 points.

Nothing on the homepage tells a crawler to skip it or to withhold its snippet.

Passes.

Penalty: 0 of 25 points.

The captured homepage HTML contains 971 content words; completeness is not assessed.

Passes.

Penalty: 0 of 25 points.

robots.txt allows every known search and user-fetch crawler to reach the homepage.

Passes.

Penalty: 0 of 10 points.

The homepage is served over HTTPS and returns HTTP 200.

Passes.

Penalty: 0 of 3 points.

The homepage provides both a non-empty title and meta description.

Passes.

Penalty: 0 of 3 points.

The homepage is reached in 0 redirects.

Passes.

Penalty: 0 of 3 points.

The homepage reached a plain crawler in 76 ms.

Agent capabilities

0 of 11 · no points

Each one found adds +1 to the badge.

Not applicable.

Adds +1 to the badge when found.

No API catalog published.

Not applicable.

Adds +1 to the badge when found.

No /auth.md published.

Not applicable.

Adds +1 to the badge when found.

No AI Catalog published, so no MCP server card can be discovered.

Not applicable.

Adds +1 to the badge when found.

No A2A Agent Card at /.well-known/agent-card.json, and none listed in an AI Catalog.

Not applicable.

Adds +1 to the badge when found.

No usable Agent Skills index was found at either well-known path or in the AI Catalog.

Not applicable.

Adds +1 to the badge when found.

No WebMCP declarations were found in the collected HTML or inline scripts. External scripts were not inspected.

Not applicable.

Adds +1 to the badge when found.

No Web Bot Auth key directory at /.well-known/http-message-signatures-directory.

Not applicable.

Adds +1 to the badge when found.

No HTTP 402 payment challenge on the homepage or robots.txt, and no manifest at /.well-known/x402.

Not applicable.

Adds +1 to the badge when found.

No ACP discovery declaration established at /.well-known/acp.json.

Not applicable.

Adds +1 to the badge when found.

No UCP discovery declaration established at /.well-known/ucp.

Not applicable.

Adds +1 to the badge when found.

No public AMP discovery declaration established. Private or hidden agents may not advertise one to our crawler.

Site profile

Login
Not established
API
Not established
Commerce
Not established

It decides which conditional checks apply. “Not established” means no proof in what we read, not proof of absence.

Access & usage policy

Who can read this page, and for what purpose?

GoodForBotsBot received HTTP 200 via a direct request. No indexing restriction was observed in the supported homepage directives.

Sampled URL: https://tale.dev/

Declared crawling rules

No matching refusal for this URL was found for the listed identities.

Sources and scope: declared crawling rules
  • Declared allow · Scan admission

    • GoodForBotsBot/1.0 (+https://goodforbots.com/bot)

    The recorded robots admission decision allowed our crawler to proceed.

    GoodForBotsBot admission along the homepage request chain

    https://tale.dev/

    robots.txt is present and valid

  • Declared allow · robots.txt

    • goodforbotsbot (Site diagnostics)
    • * (Default robots group)
    • oai-searchbot (ai-search)
    • claude-searchbot (ai-search)
    • perplexitybot (ai-search)
    • mistralai-index (ai-search)
    • kimi-searchbot (ai-search)
    • amzn-searchbot (ai-search)
    • meta-webindexer (ai-search)
    • exasearchbot (ai-search)
    • aiwebindex (ai-search)
    • duckassistbot (ai-search)
    • shapbot (ai-search)
    • yandexadditional (ai-search)
    • yandexadditionalbot (ai-search)
    • gptbot (ai-training)
    • claudebot (ai-training)
    • mistralai-training (ai-training)
    • kimibot (ai-training)
    • ai2bot (Unknown)
    • applebot-extended (ai-training)
    • webzio-extended (ai-training)
    • chatgpt-user (user-fetch)
    • claude-user (user-fetch)
    • perplexity-user (user-fetch)
    • mistralai-user (user-fetch)
    • kimi-user (user-fetch)
    • amzn-user (user-fetch)
    • diffbot-user (user-fetch)
    • firecrawlagent (extraction)
    • webzio (extraction)
    • meta-externalfetcher (user-fetch, agent)
    • google-extended (ai-training, grounding)
    • meta-externalagent (ai-training, product-improvement)
    • amazonbot (ai-training, product-improvement)
    • ccbot (open-dataset, ai-training)
    • googlebot (search)
    • bingbot (search)

    No matching refusal for this URL in the applicable robots group. This is a declaration, not an access test.

    Acquisition of https://tale.dev/

    https://tale.dev/robots.txt

    User-agent: *
    allow: /

    robots.txt is present and validStates a position on AI crawlersAllows search and user-fetch crawlers

Observed access

GoodForBotsBot received HTTP 200 via a direct request.

Sources and scope: observed access
Coverage and interpretation
  • Crawler coverage includes the registered identities and up to 50 user-agent entries from robots.txt. Source excerpts and detail groups are bounded; omissions are labelled.
  • Observed access describes GoodForBotsBot only. Other crawler entries describe declared rules, not tests of those operators' access.
  • Coverage is the sampled homepage response and collected robots.txt files. No indexing or citation is guaranteed. Usage preferences are declarations, not a legal determination of permission.
  • This explanation adds no points or penalties. Any score effects belong to the linked checks.
  • AIPREF and Content Signals keep their own definitions. AIPREF search can include processing used exclusively for search; training preferences are not a blanket ruling on every search process.

In its category

4th of 34 in AI Products & Agents

  1. 1Contents Pilotcontentspilot.com
  2. 2Pathnovopathnovo.com
  3. 4Tale · this reporttale.dev

The prompts in the owner view would take Tale to 98, first in its category.

To the prompts →

Category average 60. The percentile appears once the catalogue holds a few hundred sites.

Scan details

Every scan is kept. Pro draws the history as a chart →

Scanned
16 Oct 2026
Rubric
0.9.0
Requests
25
Fetched
2 MB
Took
15.8 s
Homepage
76 ms · direct
Pages read
4
robots.txt
allowed
Which pages the scan read

The homepage and up to three pages from the sitemap and homepage links. Structured data, page structure, Markdown negotiation and typed links check each page read and take the median page; other checks read the homepage.

  • Homepagealways read
  • /pricingpricing · linked from the homepage · from the sitemap · read
  • /changelogcollection · linked from the homepage · from the sitemap · read
  • /contactcontact · linked from the homepage · from the sitemap · read

More like Tale:AI Products & AgentsProject ManagementAI & Machine LearningOpen Source

Also AI & Machine Learning

goodforbots.com

Evaluates website readability for AI crawlers and language models with a scoring rubric

Same category

chatmizer.com

Omnichannel AI messaging platform for customer support, sales, and bookings

Same category

snappchart.app

AI chart analysis tool that grades trade setups from uploaded screenshots

Same category

spritegen.ai

AI-powered sprite sheet generator for game developers

Same category

pathnovo.com

AI agents that parse engineering documents into structured data for enterprise systems

Same category

aipicturesque.com

Freemium AI creative studio combining image, video, audio, and motion models in one workspace

Do you run tale.dev? Open the owner view → Removing the listing is free. Remove →